<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Scaine.net &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scaine.net/site/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scaine.net/site</link>
	<description>Where confusion is mandatory</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 13:34:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Apple vs Google</title>
		<link>http://www.scaine.net/site/2010/10/apple-vs-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scaine.net/site/2010/10/apple-vs-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 21:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scaine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walled]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scaine.net/site/?p=245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How can I defend Google while slating Apple?  How can someone put Apple down for their &#8220;we know better&#8221; walled-garden approach to the AppStore, the iPhone and iPad, while on the other hand defend Google&#8217;s invasive &#8220;if you need something to be private, you probably shouldn&#8217;t be doing it in the first place&#8221; attitude?  It&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><div class="shr-publisher-245"></div><p>How can I defend Google while slating Apple?  How can someone put Apple down for their &#8220;we know better&#8221; <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/05/adobe_cto_on_apple_flash_ban/" target="_blank">walled-garden</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walled_garden_(technology)" target="_blank">approach</a> to the AppStore, the iPhone and iPad, while on the other hand defend Google&#8217;s invasive &#8220;if you need something to be private, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/07/google-ceo-on-privacy-if_n_383105.html" target="_self">you probably shouldn&#8217;t be doing it in the first place</a>&#8221; attitude?  It&#8217;s a tough one, honestly.  Google is by no means perfect, but there are key differences to the way these companies operate and while I believe that they&#8217;re both &#8220;the devil you know&#8221;, I do feel at least that Google <em>is</em> somewhat more defensible than Apple.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how I see it.</p>
<p>If I was trying to browse porn :</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Apple wouldn&#8217;t let me, while Google would, but wants to know what kind so that they can target better ads during the experience.</p>
<p>If I&#8217;m trying to rent a movie :</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Apple demands that I do so via iTunes and puts barriers in front of any other way, while Google wants to know what kind of movie it is so that they can suggest alternatives and profile my preferences.</p>
<p>If I&#8217;m trying to sell my PC :</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Apple tries to sell me a Mac, an iPad or an iPhone, while Google doesn&#8217;t care because their products don&#8217;t often care what your platform is.</p>
<p>I find Apple&#8217;s approach insidious, distinctly creepy even.  Like AOL in the late 90&#8242;s, they seem to be intent on ignoring the internet-at-large and redefining it to suit their purposes.  Vetting their appstore, denying flash, insisting on a mac-only development model (now recently reversed), Fairplay DRM, iTunes.  It&#8217;s all about control &#8211; the control that Apple has over what you can see and do on the products they sold you, usually so that they can sell you more products.</p>
<p>After the fact, I don&#8217;t believe it feels like &#8216;owning&#8217; an Apple product &#8211; it feels like renting.  First generation products are intentionally crippled to ensure that next year&#8217;s model is a must have and despite the fact that this policy spits in the eye of their most loyal followers, the Apple fanbois lap it up and open their wallet year on year.</p>
<div id="attachment_255" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 410px"><img class="size-full wp-image-255 " title="Google Latitude Dashboard" src="http://www.scaine.net/site/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/GoogleLatitudeDashboard.png" alt="" width="400" height="200" /><p class="wp-caption-text">My Latitude breakdown : home is where the heart is, I suppose</p></div>
<p>Google is nearly as bad, even if we use the same adjectives - insidious and creepy.  If you&#8217;re not careful after you sign up for a Google account, they&#8217;ll know nearly everything about you.  Simply by signing on with their latitude service for example, they can <a title="Latitude Dashboard" href="https://www.google.com/latitude/apps/history/dashboard" target="_blank">deduce where you work</a> by noting your position from 9am to 5pm most week days.  At least they&#8217;re not shy about admitting it, but it&#8217;s still a big deal.  And their approach to privacy over the years has proven to be only slightly better than Facebook themselves, the undisputed masters of privacy cock-up.  It still surprises me that Google&#8217;s high profile blunders with Buzz and Streetview didn&#8217;t harm their brand far more.  Dont&#8217; people get it?  Don&#8217;t they realise how invasive this stuff is?</p>
<p>So, really, this is an imperfect choice between two high profile monopolists.  But I will <em>never</em> accept that a faceless corporation knows better than me when I chose a course of action and I will therefore <em>never</em> own another Apple product during my life.</p>
<p>Google might know what I&#8217;m doing in the near to mid-term future, but at least they won&#8217;t judge me while I&#8217;m doing it.</p>
<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><div class='shareaholic-like-buttonset' style='float:none;height:30px;'><a class='shareaholic-googleplusone' data-shr_size='medium' data-shr_count='true' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scaine.net%2Fsite%2F2010%2F10%2Fapple-vs-google%2F' data-shr_title='Apple+vs+Google'></a><a class='shareaholic-fblike' data-shr_layout='button_count' data-shr_showfaces='false' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scaine.net%2Fsite%2F2010%2F10%2Fapple-vs-google%2F' data-shr_title='Apple+vs+Google'></a></div><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scaine.net/site/2010/10/apple-vs-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chromium (Take Two)</title>
		<link>http://www.scaine.net/site/2010/07/chromium-take-two/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scaine.net/site/2010/07/chromium-take-two/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 20:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scaine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adblock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chromium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FEBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flashblock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syncplaces]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scaine.net/site/?p=187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was September last year when I last properly tried Chromium in Ubuntu.  Back then, there was no bookmark sync, extensions were a glint in the dev&#8217;s eyes and GTK theme support was a new feature. I didn&#8217;t particularly elaborate in that article about why I didn&#8217;t make the switch back then.  In fact, I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><div class="shr-publisher-187"></div><p><a rel="attachment wp-att-197" href="http://www.scaine.net/site/2010/07/chromium-take-two/chromium-logo/"><img class="size-full wp-image-197 alignleft" title="Chromium Logo" src="http://www.scaine.net/site/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/chromium-logo.png" alt="Chromium Logo" width="107" height="107" /></a>It was <a title="Chromium on Ubuntu" href="http://www.scaine.net/site/2009/09/chromium-on-ubuntu/" target="_blank">September last year when I last properly tried Chromium</a> in Ubuntu.  Back then, there was no bookmark sync, extensions were a glint in the dev&#8217;s eyes and GTK theme support was a new feature.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t particularly elaborate in that article about why I didn&#8217;t make the switch back then.  In fact, I open the article claiming that the experience was a mixed bag, then pretty much rave about it!  I must have been tired that day&#8230;</p>
<h4>Then</h4>
<p>The primary reason I didn&#8217;t switch was that I was hooked on Firefox extensions.  Well, four anyway &#8211; SyncPlaces, Flashblock, AdBlock and FEBE.</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="Syncplaces" href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/8426/" target="_blank">Syncplaces</a> will sync bookmarks using any FTP, NFS or Samba share.</li>
<li><a title="Flashblock" href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/433/" target="_blank">Flackblock</a> does what it says on the tin &#8211; it replaces Flash elements on a web page with a click-able placeholder.</li>
<li><a title="AdBlock" href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1865/" target="_blank">AdBlock Plus</a> needs no introduction.  As far as I know, the best advert blocker for any browser.   Go on, prove me wrong!</li>
<li><a title="FEBE" href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/2109/" target="_blank">FEBE</a> is a backup and restore tool.</li>
</ul>
<h4>Now</h4>
<p>Flash forward, 9 months later : present day.  3 of these extensions now exist on Chromium, kind of.  Here they are :</p>
<ul>
<li>Chromium Sync.  Technically, not an extension : this is now built into Chromium itself and all you need is a Google account.  Your bookmarks, extensions, preferences, auto fill and themes can be synced across any PC you use Chromium.  Syncplaces was, by comparison, pretty horrific to set up (and needed to be downloaded first), but it did mitigate any privacy concerns you might have about uploading your data to Google.  Personally, I use so many Google products day to day that uploading my bookmarks wasn&#8217;t a concern.  Your mileage may vary.</li>
</ul>
<div id="attachment_189" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 406px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-189" href="http://www.scaine.net/site/2010/07/chromium-take-two/chromium-sync/"><img class="size-full wp-image-189" title="Chromium - Sync" src="http://www.scaine.net/site/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Chromium-Sync.png" alt="Chromium - Sync option" width="396" height="125" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Chromium Sync Option</p></div>
<div id="attachment_190" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 420px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-190" href="http://www.scaine.net/site/2010/07/chromium-take-two/chromium-set-up-sync/"><img class="size-full wp-image-190" title="Chromium - Set up sync" src="http://www.scaine.net/site/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Chromium-Set-up-sync.png" alt="Chromium - Set up sync" width="410" height="407" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Sync Options</p></div>
<ul>
<li><a title="Flashblock for Chromium" href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/gofhjkjmkpinhpoiabjplobcaignabnl?hl=en" target="_blank">Flashblock</a> for Chromium shares its name with its Firefox compatriot, but they&#8217;re by different authors.  There may be trouble ahead!</li>
<li>Similar story for <a title="Adblock for Chromium" href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/gighmmpiobklfepjocnamgkkbiglidom?hl=en" target="_blank">AdBlock</a> for Chromium.  Well, at least it&#8217;s not called &#8220;Adblock Plus&#8221;!  This has similar functionality to its Firefox big brother, allowing multiple subscriptions to keep the adblock relevant, and it can also be turned on/off for specific sites.  It does <em>not</em>, however, sport the incredible per-element blocking that made the original so powerful.</li>
</ul>
<div id="attachment_191" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 610px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-191" href="http://www.scaine.net/site/2010/07/chromium-take-two/adblock-options/"><img class="size-large wp-image-191" title="AdBlock options" src="http://www.scaine.net/site/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/AdBlock-options-640x391.png" alt="AdBlock options" width="600" height="366" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">AdBlock options</p></div>
<p>So, what&#8217;s missing?  Well, FEBE, obviously.  I still can&#8217;t find an extension which will &#8220;snapshot&#8221; my Chromium install and perfectly restore it on another machine.  My Firefox browsing history goes back about 2 years, across 4 different operating systems thanks to FEBE.  However, given that Chromium Sync started off as just Bookmarks before expanding into Themes, and just recently Extensions, I suspect that it&#8217;s only a matter of time before we see History too.</p>
<p>Google Sync puts all your data into a special directory on Google Docs, so I imagine that anything (within reason) could be stored there in future.</p>
<div id="attachment_192" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 610px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-192" href="http://www.scaine.net/site/2010/07/chromium-take-two/google-docs-storage/"><img class="size-large wp-image-192" title="Google Docs storage" src="http://www.scaine.net/site/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Google-Docs-storage-640x468.png" alt="Google Docs storage" width="600" height="438" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Google Docs</p></div>
<h4>We Fear Change</h4>
<p>So did I make the switch?  Incredibly, given my history and love of Firefox : &#8220;Yep&#8221;.  In February, I bought my Google Nexus One phone and on that day, I suspect that I may just have sold my soul to Google.  In April, Froyo fever started pitching and in preparation, I started dabbling with Chromium again.  Finally, after May&#8217;s Google I/O conference when Froyo was announced, one feature in particular swayed me towards moving to Chromium whole scale &#8211; the cloud sync feature.  This is where you buy music on Amazon (or <a title="Google Music Service" href="http://www.techtechies.com/20100707/technology-news/android-3-0-google-music-are-coming-to-us-google-music-android-3-0-together-coming-this-winter.html" target="_blank">Google themselves</a> this Christmas, perhaps) and you simply send your purchase to your phone, right from within the web page.  Or perhaps you&#8217;re on Google Maps getting directions, and those directions are sent as Navigate options to your phone.  Very sweet.  But initially at least, I think it requires Chromium.</p>
<h4>Pros</h4>
<ul>
<li>Start up hasn&#8217;t changed in 9 months &#8211; it&#8217;s still blindingly fast.</li>
<li>The Javascript engine is famously fast and <a title="Chromium Experiments" href="http://www.chromeexperiments.com/" target="_blank">sites</a> <a title="Mr Doobs Cool Stuff" href="http://mrdoob.com/" target="_blank">like</a> <a title="Google V8 Benchmark" href="http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/data/benchmarks/v5/run.html" target="_blank">this</a> will prove that very effectively.  Perhaps Firefox 4 will close the gap here though.</li>
<li>Extensions install instantly.  They un-install just as fast.  Their options pages are web pages, which makes for a very integrated, natural feeling.</li>
<li>Chomium Sync, despite being Google-only, will rock your world if you use Chromium on more than one PC.</li>
<li>The &#8220;Awesome Bar&#8221; doubles as a URL entry location and a search bar in one.  I think this used to be offered in Firefox, then reverted.  The latest rumours I&#8217;ve heard suggest that it&#8217;s heading back to one-bar for Firefox 4.</li>
<li>Did I mention that start up?</li>
</ul>
<h4>Cons</h4>
<ul>
<li>In order to take advantage of the speed of development, I&#8217;m using the daily build PPA (details below).  This means two things.  One, you&#8217;ll be prompted to update every day by your package manager.  Two, many banking websites won&#8217;t entertain you.  Here in the UK, I have one account at the RBS and they block beta builds.  Interesting actually &#8211; even a user-agent switcher doesn&#8217;t fool their website, so they must be fingerprinting another way somehow.</li>
<li>In the short term, a few things will have moved around and will take getting used to.  Nothing major, but here&#8217;s an example : right clicking on a link in Firefox, &#8220;Open in New Tab&#8221; is the third option down, but in Chromium it&#8217;s the top option.  There&#8217;s a few little gotchas like this.</li>
<li>Bookmark organisation isn&#8217;t quite as slick as Firefox yet.  You can&#8217;t grab tabs and create shortcuts from them &#8211; you must still use the favicon logo to the left of the URL.  If, like me, you keep multiple folders on the toolbar, you&#8217;ll find that you  can&#8217;t re-order the bookmarks inside these folder using drag-and-drop.  You have to right-click, open the organiser and do it there.  Finally, I&#8217;m not convinced by &#8220;Other Bookmarks&#8221;.  It gets cluttered very quickly and takes up valuable toolbar space if you don&#8217;t use it.</li>
<li>Downloads are pretty intrusive, with a big bar appearing at the bottom of the browser whenever anything comes down the line.  You have to manually close it after each download.  I couldn&#8217;t find a way, extension or otherwise, of changing this.</li>
</ul>
<h4>Install</h4>
<p>I use the daily builds (<a href="https://launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/ppa">https://launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/ppa</a>), so in order to install, just pop these commands into a terminal</p>
<pre style="padding-left: 30px;">sudo add-apt-repository ppa:chromium-daily/ppa</pre>
<pre style="padding-left: 30px;">sudo apt-get update</pre>
<pre style="padding-left: 30px;">sudo apt-get install chromium-browser</pre>
<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><div class='shareaholic-like-buttonset' style='float:none;height:30px;'><a class='shareaholic-googleplusone' data-shr_size='medium' data-shr_count='true' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scaine.net%2Fsite%2F2010%2F07%2Fchromium-take-two%2F' data-shr_title='Chromium+%28Take+Two%29'></a><a class='shareaholic-fblike' data-shr_layout='button_count' data-shr_showfaces='false' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scaine.net%2Fsite%2F2010%2F07%2Fchromium-take-two%2F' data-shr_title='Chromium+%28Take+Two%29'></a></div><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scaine.net/site/2010/07/chromium-take-two/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

